TRC Tweaks??

[Deleted]

With 6 (or 7)  TRC members (Cards, D'Backs, Brewers, Dodgers, Rangers, Royals, and Yankees ?) should there now be 4 votes to decide on a trade?  I'm not in agreement with a first come first severed situation deciding the outcome.  Let's hear from the majority of the TRC to decide a trade.

I know others have some concerns about some other things like the amount of time it takes to get votes at times or comments made by TRC members (I am entertained by them).

I felt the need to post as I am the king of  Minutia.

[Deleted]

If TRC is officially 7 teams, I agree it should be 4 approves/veotes to decide a trade, but I'm not clear on Eric's official status in TRC.

I do think an odd number in TRC works better so there can't be a split vote.

[BrewCrewGM]

I don't really care either way to be honest

[Halejon/Nationals GM]

I think the #1 priority for the TRC should be to stop calling votes against "vetoes".

[St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew)]

We went with 3 as there is often at least one TRC member involved in a trade.

[Deleted]

Jan 7, 2017 0:15:23 GMT -5 St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew) said:

We went with 3 as there is often at least one TRC member involved in a trade.

If it helps, I have TRC experience in the past and would volunteer to vote on deals with a member involved if this gains any traction. I can see it both ways here.

[Deleted]

It would be nice to have a TRC reserve for trades that TRC members are involved in. My least favorite scenario is when 2 TRC members trade with each other and then you need nearly everyone from TRC to vote on the deal (this is where Eric has been stepping in for the most part now that I think about it)

[Mets GM]

Can we just add Rays to the TRC so we can make him happy