We should try and come up with different lists in different orders of who's been inactive and for how long. Might be a fun game while we wait to decide if we're gonna replace these dedicated Fantasy players.
Who's with me???
Excuse the excell formatting copy/paste job but i think this is simple enough. The only major improvement that could be made to this list is if an admin could see if the questionably active owners have PM'd recently.
Team:....Last Online:...Last post:....As of: 7:48pm EST August 31st 2013
Reds......31-Aug........31-Aug
Indians...28-Aug........01-Aug
Nats......25-Aug........02-Aug
Pirates...25-Jul........24-Jun
Angels....31-Aug........15-Jul
Orioles...31-Aug........31-Aug
Dodgers...31-Aug........31-Aug
Rays......31-Aug........31-Aug
Brewers...31-Aug........31-Aug
Red Sox...31-Aug........22-Aug
White Sox.31-Aug........31-Aug
Mets......04-Aug........23-Jun
Rangers...31-Aug........30-Aug
Twins.....30-Aug........18-Aug
Cardinals.31-Aug........31-Aug
DBacks....31-Aug........31-Aug
Marlins...31-Aug........31-Aug
Mariners..31-Aug........31-Aug
Braves....26-Aug........25-Aug
Padres....30-Aug........17-Aug
Giants....31-Aug........29-Aug
Astros....30-Aug........29-Aug
Royals....31-Aug........30-Aug
Rockies...31-Aug........29-Aug
Phillies..17-Jul........01-Jun
Blue Jays.28-Aug........25-Aug
Yankees...31-Aug........31-Aug
Cubs......31-Aug........19-Aug
Tigers....31-Aug........31-Aug
A's.......31-Aug........30-Aug
So if we remove the obviously active (we'll arbitrarly draw the line at July 31st) we're left with:
Team:.....Last Online:..Last post:....As of: 7:48pm EST August 31st 2013
Indians...28-Aug........01-Aug
Nationals.25-Aug........02-Aug
Pirates...25-Jul........24-Jun
Angels....31-Aug........15-Jul
Mets......04-Aug........23-Jun
Phillies..17-Jul........01-Jun
Some of these are pretty odd but honestly I'd be OK with replacing them all.
Indians, Nationals, Pirates, and Angels are all new owners who though signing on fairly steadily have been extremely inactive. And i mean come on, we were already close to replacing Nats once. And as much as i can't wait to hear the, "I'm a United States Air Force Officer" speech again, the dude obviously is not cut out for the activity this league deserves, and neither are the other new owners.
Mets is close but i know i have sent him a few PM's and never gotten a reply. He's pretty borderline imo because OK, if you want to be an isolated owner but take care of your team, i guess that's fine...but it does zap some fun out of the league...at least from my perspective. +
Phillies is a no-brainer.
Just my 2c