|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 10, 2023 7:49:13 GMT -5
I didn't ask for a premium on what I paid. I'm not sure where you got that from.
I'm asking for IFA compensation to be 1:1 on what I paid for it, or what I traded it off as. Which is exactly the same (barring minor fluctuations). And that 1:1 ratio be applied to the compensation to all Managers with remaining IFA.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCrewGM on Mar 10, 2023 12:41:11 GMT -5
I didn't ask for a premium on what I paid. I'm not sure where you got that from. I'm asking for IFA compensation to be 1:1 on what I paid for it, or what I traded it off as. Which is exactly the same (barring minor fluctuations). And that 1:1 ratio be applied to the compensation to all Managers with remaining IFA. What do you think would be fair value for your IFA money? Just curious. |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 10, 2023 13:26:48 GMT -5
I didn't ask for a premium on what I paid. I'm not sure where you got that from. I'm asking for IFA compensation to be 1:1 on what I paid for it, or what I traded it off as. Which is exactly the same (barring minor fluctuations). And that 1:1 ratio be applied to the compensation to all Managers with remaining IFA. What do you think would be fair value for your IFA money? Just curious. There are other factors, layers. Will TPB compensation all be converted in one draft, over multiple drafts? |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 10, 2023 13:42:25 GMT -5
I worked something out I feel is fair for my total IFA $. But other Managers having IFA $$ and where there compensation would lie, factors in.
I will be spending IFA $ between now and the 2023 TPB Amateur draft. So as my Total amount drops, my compensation picks would disappear accordingly.
2023 TPB Amateur Draft
Compensation Round (1) Picks #31,#32,#33,#34,#35,#36 Compensation Round #2 Picks: #61,#62,#63,#64,#65,#66
2024 TPB Amateur Draft
Compensation Round (1) Picks #31, #32,#33,#34,#35,#36 Compensation Round #2 Picks: #61,#62,#63,#64,#65,#66
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCrewGM on Mar 10, 2023 13:53:30 GMT -5
I worked something out I feel is fair for my total IFA $. But other Managers having IFA $$ and where there compensation would lie, factors in. I will be spending IFA $ between now and the 2023 TPB Amateur draft. So as my Total amount drops, my compensation picks would disappear accordingly. 2023 TPB Amateur Draft Compensation Round (1) Picks #31,#32,#33,#34,#35 Compensation Round #2 Picks: #61,#62,#63,#64,#65 2024 TPB Amateur Draft Compensation Round (1) Picks #31, #32,#33,#34,#35 Compensation Round #2 Picks: #61,#62,#63,#64,#65 I’d have no issue with that. We’d obviously have to wait to finalize things, but on the surface that looks feasible to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 10, 2023 13:56:49 GMT -5
I edited while you're responding. In my calculations I had pick 30 & pick 60 factored in, but realized it was part of Round 1 & 2 still. So, I removed those from both and added 36 & 66 on for both years
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 10, 2023 14:04:31 GMT -5
Or I could do
2023 + 2024 + 2025 Draft
Picks 31-36
Eliminating the 2nd Comp Round picks altogether and be done with it
|
|
|
|
Post by Arizona D'backs (Sean) on Mar 26, 2023 14:15:09 GMT -5
Is it too late for changes going into the season?
K to k% and penalty for not meeting minimums?
If so we should maybe set a designated time for next off season for discussion first then voting.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCrewGM on Mar 26, 2023 14:40:54 GMT -5
Is it too late for changes going into the season? K to k% and penalty for not meeting minimums? If so we should maybe set a designated time for next off season for discussion first then voting. Hitting K% was already voted on this offseason and passed. An admin can confirm this but it’s going to go into effect this season. There’s no reason it shouldn’t. St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew) |
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew) on Mar 26, 2023 19:06:34 GMT -5
Is it too late for changes going into the season? K to k% and penalty for not meeting minimums? If so we should maybe set a designated time for next off season for discussion first then voting. Hitting K% was already voted on this offseason and passed. An admin can confirm this but it’s going to go into effect this season. There’s no reason it shouldn’t. St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew)I don’t see why this shouldn’t take effect 2023 |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 26, 2023 22:02:44 GMT -5
I just had a look at the scoring categories. I can't find K%. Can someone else have a look
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCrewGM on Mar 26, 2023 22:25:39 GMT -5
Mentioned this on the chat but may as well do it here too:
K% isn’t listed as a scoring category option but K/PA (strikeouts per plate appearance) is, which is the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Mar 27, 2023 21:02:33 GMT -5
Mentioned this on the chat but may as well do it here too: K% isn’t listed as a scoring category option but K/PA (strikeouts per plate appearance) is, which is the same thing. I still don't see it Dan. Can someone with Commish powers on Fantrax look for the stat Dan is referencing?? |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Apr 13, 2023 7:42:55 GMT -5
Thoughts on creating a Rule 5 draft for TPB. It would create some churn on our rosters and would allow teams at the bottom of the standings to find more optimal pieces to roster on their 40 man than what they currently have.
|
|
|
|
Post by Houston Astros on Apr 13, 2023 8:01:55 GMT -5
Would love that - I've thought about making the comment in years past but wasn't sure how it would come across
|
|
|
|
Post by Arizona D'backs (Sean) on Apr 13, 2023 9:23:31 GMT -5
Thoughts on creating a Rule 5 draft for TPB. It would create some churn on our rosters and would allow teams at the bottom of the standings to find more optimal pieces to roster on their 40 man than what they currently have. How would it be implemented? Which players would be eligible for selection? |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Apr 13, 2023 12:51:24 GMT -5
Thoughts on creating a Rule 5 draft for TPB. It would create some churn on our rosters and would allow teams at the bottom of the standings to find more optimal pieces to roster on their 40 man than what they currently have. How would it be implemented? Which players would be eligible for selection? Each team would submit their 40 man roster by a set date. Second step. Each player page on Fangraphs has their Rule 5 year/service time/eligible. Fangraphs Roster Resource Depth Charts also has most prominent players/prospects Rule 5 dates listed if the player page doesn't. If a player/prospect is not on the submitted TPB 40 man rosters and they are listed on FG as "eligible", or they're rule 5 eligible for that year, or they're on an MLB team's 40, those players would be eligible to be selected in the Rule 5 draft. The Rule 5 draft would be reverse order of the past season standings and not snake format. The number of rounds would be TBD by vote or the TPB Exec. We could follow real MLB rules and offer said selected Rule 5 player back to the team they were selected from if they eventually become unwanted on the selecting team's 40 man. Or we could disregard this rule and allow the drop, and the player would become a TPB FA. |
|
|
|
Post by BrewCrewGM on Apr 13, 2023 13:05:56 GMT -5
How would it be implemented? Which players would be eligible for selection? Each team would submit their 40 man roster by a set date. Second step. Each player page on Fangraphs has their Rule 5 year/service time/eligible. Fangraphs Roster Resource Depth Charts also has most prominent players/prospects Rule 5 dates listed if the player page doesn't. If a player/prospect is not on the submitted TPB 40 man rosters and they are listed on FG as "eligible", or they're rule 5 eligible for that year, or they're on an MLB team's 40, those players would be eligible to be selected in the Rule 5 draft. The Rule 5 draft would be reverse order of the past season standings and not snake format. The number of rounds would be TBD by vote or the TPB Exec. We could follow real MLB rules and offer said selected Rule 5 player back to the team they were selected from if they eventually become unwanted on the selecting team's 40 man. Or we could disregard this rule and allow the drop, and the player would become a TPB FA. It’s an interesting idea but this seems to be a lot of work, especially the second step. I don’t know how that can be overseen except going through a roster and looking up players one by one. Don’t know if relying on each owner to do that themselves is feasible. And honestly it’d be for something that isn’t terribly significant. But if the majority of the league would be on board with this idea, so be it. |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Apr 13, 2023 14:34:00 GMT -5
Each team would submit their 40 man roster by a set date. Second step. Each player page on Fangraphs has their Rule 5 year/service time/eligible. Fangraphs Roster Resource Depth Charts also has most prominent players/prospects Rule 5 dates listed if the player page doesn't. If a player/prospect is not on the submitted TPB 40 man rosters and they are listed on FG as "eligible", or they're rule 5 eligible for that year, or they're on an MLB team's 40, those players would be eligible to be selected in the Rule 5 draft. The Rule 5 draft would be reverse order of the past season standings and not snake format. The number of rounds would be TBD by vote or the TPB Exec. We could follow real MLB rules and offer said selected Rule 5 player back to the team they were selected from if they eventually become unwanted on the selecting team's 40 man. Or we could disregard this rule and allow the drop, and the player would become a TPB FA. It’s an interesting idea but this seems to be a lot of work, especially the second step. I don’t know how that can be overseen except going through a roster and looking up players one by one. Don’t know if relying on each owner to do that themselves is feasible. And honestly it’d be for something that isn’t terribly significant. But if the majority of the league would be on board with this idea, so be it. Another league I'm in has something similar. And yes it's basically it's a peruse the rosters of other Managers player by player. In the other league though the Commishes maintain a spreadsheet that has the players and their R5 year listed. So you can scan for eligible players pretty quickly. |
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Oct 26, 2023 9:20:26 GMT -5
Suggested Rule: If a team is found to be over their organization limits on Fantrax they are not permitted to make a trade unless they get their roster to the limit, or under before the trade is made.
All trades should be vetoed until the team is in TPB roster compliance.
|
|
