Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 8:07:03 GMT -5
I suspect the question gets tossed around here once in a while, but the following article caught my eye yesterday: MLB average salary exceeds $3.8MI understand that the League started either with the 2009 or the 2010 season, when the average salary was around $3M and the cap was set at $100M. There has been, I believe, one increase in cap of around $5M, or 5%, during which time the average MLB salary has increased by a third. The average MLB salary increase almost 13% in 2013. I expect we'll see similar numbers in 2014 and again for this season. I will acknowledge that an increase will help the Indians in our current situation, but we're not the only one. I also recognize that the increase in average salary is being driven by huge deals to some UFAs. An increase across the board will also lower the value of some Cap transfer deals. I want to start the conversation.
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Dec 29, 2014 8:54:25 GMT -5
Last year we also brought down the minimum salary to $500K from $1M. So that cleared up a bunch of cap for alot of teams. I cant see an increase anytime soon. Honestly it makes the managers have to manage their team better when they make trades etc. You always have to be aware of what you can spend now and somewhat look into the future to see where that players salary may get to.
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Diamondbacks on Dec 29, 2014 9:44:37 GMT -5
I honestly don't care that much what happens with MLB salaries. I would be in favor of contracts going more and more towards TPB salaries and handling everything in house. I agree with Dodgers that it does force owners to make tough decisions and I am absolutely not in favor of bailing out guys who aren't thinking about the future.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 11:18:22 GMT -5
I would suggest that the idea of using TPB salaries simply would not work, until you get guys like Trout, Kershaw, Scherzer, etc, being dropped and re-bid on because no one can reasonably hope to field an actual team when 30+% of their salary cap is dedicated to one player. The thing about Dynasty Leagues is planning for the future. The thing about Major League players is that their salaries are affected as much by the CBA as by their talent. Salaries change over time: That's one of the things that is fun about this League. If we go with TPB contracts only, that would just be a recipe for disaster and confusion and would eliminate the need for prospects.
I'm not suggesting a "bail out" of a manager who did not plan ahead. An owner can easily "bail" by dumping salary just before a season begins. What I would be suggesting is some kind of reasonably predictable annual increase, to start with the 2016 season. Any professional league with a salary cap does the same.
In 2010, there were 25 players making $15.5 million, and the average salary was $3.3M.
In 2015, Yadier Molina's $15.2M is #50, meaning the number of players taking more than 1/6 of the nominal salary cap has doubled. There remain a number of players left to sign, one of whom is obviously Max Scherzer. Average salary looks like $4M, which means that a 31 man roster made up of average salaries costs $124M, or $20M (17-18%) more than the nominal Cap.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 11:55:35 GMT -5
MLB average = 116 TPB average = 124
I wouldn't mind being 5M ahead of MLB average because we obviously can't know what the coming year's average is going to be, but maybe that could be the rule. TPB will always be 5M average higher than the previous season's average salary. That would probably be the easiest way for everybody involved.
We haven't made this official but this was the last word
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Dec 29, 2014 11:57:53 GMT -5
wow...yanks trying to play god again with the rules
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 12:30:53 GMT -5
I'll let you know the rules committee's decision as soon as it happens
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 13:57:44 GMT -5
So how many cap increases have there been? I thought the starting cap was 100M and there was one increase of 5M. Am I wrong on that? Was it originally 120?
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Dec 29, 2014 14:52:21 GMT -5
Last year we also brought down the minimum salary to $500K from $1M. So that cleared up a bunch of cap for alot of teams. I cant see an increase anytime soon. Honestly it makes the managers have to manage their team better when they make trades etc. You always have to be aware of what you can spend now and somewhat look into the future to see where that players salary may get to. Kris, I agree with you to a point. Managers will need to manage their teams better. And as long as the majority of managers don't mind the league being loaded with TPB contracts. Because at some point managers won't be able to afford real player contracts and will be forced to drop more and more players as MLB salaries escalate.
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Dec 29, 2014 14:57:34 GMT -5
So are we to give more money to teams that have willingly traded away their cap? That will just give some teams even more money to trade away again. Where does it end? More cap and smaller roster size? Makes it too easy to manage like that, might aswell make it a yahoo league if that happens.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew) on Dec 29, 2014 15:21:47 GMT -5
As Rays points out, we discussed it as the newly formed Rules Committee and the math showed the average MLB 40 man roster at $116M. Our average 31+5 man roster has a cap of $124M meaning we are ahead of the curve. As such, we decided not to propose an increase to Steve and Tim.
As for the past, we started at $115M, gave an extra $5M then gained an extra $100M between teams as rouge owners decided to give themselves extra cap.
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Dec 29, 2014 15:27:40 GMT -5
I don't mind if we have TPB contracts throughout the league. I just don't want managers who are adamant about not increasing the cap, changing their minds in time, because it affects or hurts them. You either believe in something or you don't.
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM on Dec 29, 2014 15:29:58 GMT -5
we just decreased player salaries last season to save money and are talking about possible contraction of rosters spots which would save teams even more money.
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Reds - Chris on Dec 29, 2014 15:36:27 GMT -5
we just decreased player salaries last season to save money and are talking about possible contraction of rosters spots which would save teams even more money. I'll believe it when I see it, as for rosters contracting.
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Diamondbacks on Dec 29, 2014 15:55:10 GMT -5
I will never be in favor of adding cap to every team. I'll go ahead and put it in writing.
I see no reason why we can't allow TPB to set the market on player contracts. If you don't like what MLB is paying a guy, don't pay him that.
This may mean some restructuring of how we handle contracts but I'm okay with that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 19:28:10 GMT -5
I will never be in favor of adding cap to every team. I'll go ahead and put it in writing. I see no reason why we can't allow TPB to set the market on player contracts. If you don't like what MLB is paying a guy, don't pay him that. This may mean some restructuring of how we handle contracts but I'm okay with that That goes against the whole league though. Do players reprice? Would we have TPB free agency? That just sounds like a huge nightmare logistically. I think keeping TPB's average team salary 5M in front of the previous season's MLB average team salary is the best solution
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Cardinals (Andrew) on Dec 29, 2014 21:11:58 GMT -5
^^^^ tend to agree. I think we need to stay open minded and flexible.
I like salaries tight enough that the top teams are forever making tough decisions, bringing players to the free agent market to give the weaker teams the chance to pick guys up, this evening the playing field.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 1:05:54 GMT -5
No, because idiots like myself will trade it away and the rich will continue to get richer.
I think before considering increasing salary cap we should close the loophole that allows Cap to be used to buy players and then refund it for players 1M or less to reuse it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 1:35:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 7:02:34 GMT -5
That's just ... unnecessary.
|
|